Articles - Page 4 of 4 - Joshua D. Waterston, Esq.

Have DMCA Takedowns Gone Rogue?

In 1998, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) became law. That year, Chumbawamba's "Tubthumping" topped the charts, Mark McGwire broke the home run record, Google, Inc. was formed, and smartphones didn't yet exist. The Web was in its infancy, but online service providers were concerned about their potential liability for hosting users' content. The DMCA added a new section 512 to the Copyright Act, limiting the liability for online service providers who hosted unmodified user content, adopted methods to terminate access to repeat copyright infringers, didn't interfere with copyright protection technology, and complied with copyright owners' requests to remove infringing material. This [...Read More...]

Joshua D. Waterston, Esq.2020-03-03T19:22:37-05:00March 3rd, 2020|Copyright, Intellectual Property|

Google v. Oracle – the Supreme Court’s copyright case of the decade?

Photo by Mr. Kjetil Ree. [CC BY-SA] Newsweek has called it the "copyright case of the decade" and they may be right. Google and Oracle are software titans battling over whether the freely available connections between software platforms (Application Programming Interfaces, or "APIs") can be protected by copyright law. What's an API? APIs are bits of software code which enable developers to quickly and easily build programs that integrate with a specific platform or piece of software, saving the developer from needing to write the code for commonly-used functions. For example, both Android and iOS have APIs that enable [...Read More...]

Joshua D. Waterston, Esq.2020-07-31T00:05:22-04:00January 30th, 2020|Copyright, Intellectual Property|

The KosherSwitch Patent: Protecting malfunction by design

Here's a challenge for these modern times: How do observant Jews follow the Biblical commandment to observe the Sabbath? Rabbis generally agree that driving is prohibited, and that using electricity is not prohibited - but using switches to manually turn the flow of electricity on or off is prohibited. This is why you may have seen refrigerators or ovens with a "Sabbath mode", which prevents certain functions from working on the Sabbath. By contrast, light switches don't have such a mode; they are either on or off. Which brings us to the KosherSwitch and the concept of random chance. In [...Read More...]

Joshua D. Waterston, Esq.2019-12-27T19:19:49-05:00December 27th, 2019|Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark|

No, You Can’t Trademark “OK Boomer”

You may have heard that the generational battle between "milennials" and "baby boomers" now has a catch phrase: "OK Boomer". It's a dismissive phrase by those darn youngsters who are loitering on your lawn and forgetting to pull up their pants. I'm kidding about the loitering and the pants, but the catchphrase is a real thing, and it's also become a meme. If you don't know what a meme is, then chances are that you're a boomer and may be more interested in other articles on this site instead. But I digress. "OK Boomer" has become so popular that there's [...Read More...]

Joshua D. Waterston, Esq.2020-10-30T15:00:26-04:00November 20th, 2019|Intellectual Property, Trademark|

Tales of unclean hands and stolen trade secrets

How far can businesses go to protect their intellectual property, and what is the minimum that they need to do to protect it? Two cases highlight the boundaries of trade secret law. This past February, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals held that the trade secret owner's own lack of trade secret policies did not prevent it from prevailing in trade secrets litigation against a former employee. In Scherer Design Group v. Ahead Engineering LLC, there was a question as to whether the employer secretly monitored the employee's Facebook Messenger conversations, or whether the employee had just coincidentally not logged [...Read More...]

Joshua D. Waterston, Esq.2021-08-31T17:58:02-04:00November 1st, 2019|Intellectual Property, Trade Secrets|

The Laughable Non-Disclosure Agreement

Summary: Update Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) to match the new digital reality. Businesses should be proactive to address outdated provisions in NDAs before problems occur. Remember the olden days of fax machines? You’d receive a fax with a long disclaimer at the bottom, saying something like, “This fax may contain super-secret information which could endanger our company, our world, and even our universe, if it should fall into the wrong hands. If you receive this fax by accident, you must immediately return the fax to the sender, or we will send our goons to find and severely punish you.” The question [...Read More...]

Joshua D. Waterston, Esq.2020-09-29T23:11:07-04:00May 4th, 2018|Contracts, Intellectual Property|

“The Glacier is Too Cold” – Protecting Your Right to Complain

Can a business prevent an unreasonable customer from posting a negative (and unfair) online review to Yelp, Facebook, Amazon, or other online platform? For example, a reviewer wrote, “Do Not Camp Anywhere Near Here – You Will Freeze” when posting a one-star TripAdvisor review of the Columbia Ice Field in Canada.* Yes, that’s right – the reviewer was upset that the ice field was too cold. You just can’t please some people… A client recently asked me to include a non-disparagement clause in his customer agreement. He was concerned that a customer might violate the agreement but threaten to post [...Read More...]

Joshua D. Waterston, Esq.2021-08-24T10:48:29-04:00June 15th, 2017|Contracts, Intellectual Property|